Skip to main content

What Are LI.FI Intents? LI.FI's Intent-Based Bridging Explained

LI.FI Intents is a modular execution engine that fulfills cross-chain orders through a network of professional solvers. Built on the Open Intents Framework. Live since May 2026.

Written by Eco


LI.FI Intents is a modular cross-chain execution engine that fulfills user orders through a network of professional solvers competing on price. It is LI.FI's intent-based product, built on the Open Intents Framework (OIF) reference contracts and announced as live in production on May 26, 2026, with Jumper and Rabby as launch integrators. Per LI.FI's product brief, the engine handles stablecoin swaps, tokenized real-world assets, and compliant onchain liquidity through a single intent API.

This article explains what LI.FI Intents is, how the solver network executes orders, how it relates to ERC-7683 and the Open Intents Framework, and how the architecture differs from a traditional bridge aggregator. The framing throughout is mechanism-first. LI.FI's documentation and announcements are the primary sources.

What is LI.FI?

LI.FI is a cross-chain liquidity aggregator and orchestration layer founded in 2021 by CEO Philipp Zentner. The platform aggregates DEX aggregators, bridges, and intent systems into a single API that wallets and apps use to route stablecoin transfers, token swaps, and cross-chain calls. Integrators include Jumper, MetaMask, Phantom, Rabby, and Binance wallet.

The company describes itself as a "routing and execution layer" in its developer documentation. LI.FI's earlier product surface focused on bridge aggregation, calling pre-quoted routes across Stargate, Across, Hop, and DEX aggregators like Uniswap and 1inch. LI.FI Intents is the more recent execution model, sitting alongside the aggregator API. In December 2025, LI.FI raised a $29M Series A extension led by Multicoin and CoinFund, per CoinDesk's coverage, with the round earmarked for stablecoin and RWA execution infrastructure.

What does LI.FI mean by intent-based bridging?

LI.FI's intent-based bridging means a user signs a description of the outcome they want, not a sequence of transactions. The user expresses an intent (e.g., "send 1,000 USDC from Arbitrum to Base, minimum 999 USDC out"). A solver competes to fulfill the order, fronts the destination-chain liquidity, and gets reimbursed from the user's locked source funds after settlement.

This is the same intent pattern used by Across, CoW Protocol, UniswapX, and Anoma, but LI.FI's implementation packages it as a hosted execution engine that integrators can wire into existing wallet flows. Per the May 26, 2026 announcement, the architecture is described as "production intent-based execution architecture" supporting stablecoin payments, tokenized real-world assets, and regulated onchain liquidity.

The mechanism difference from a traditional bridge is straightforward. A traditional bridge locks funds on the source chain and mints or unlocks an equivalent representation on the destination chain, which takes finality time. LI.FI Intents has a solver pay the user on the destination instantly out of the solver's own inventory, with the solver reclaiming the locked funds after source-chain finality.

How does the LI.FI Intents solver network work?

The LI.FI Intents solver network is a competing set of professional market makers that bid to fulfill user orders. According to LI.FI's launch announcement, solvers leverage centralized exchange inventory, over-the-counter desks, and proprietary balance sheets to deliver "market-maker-grade execution with tight spreads, reliable fills, and exact output amounts."

The order flow runs as follows. A user (or an integrator on the user's behalf) submits an intent through the LI.FI API. The intent is broadcast to the solver network. Solvers price the fill and compete on output amount, fees, and speed. The winning solver fronts liquidity on the destination chain, the user receives the exact-output amount specified in the intent, and the solver claims the user's source funds once the source-chain transaction finalizes.

LI.FI's resource locks article describes the deeper mechanism for scaling solver inventory: users commit funds to a resource lock (typically time-bound) that an allocator validates, an intent marketplace selects a solver, the solver executes, and an arbiter verifies the action completed. LI.FI integrates with The Compact (an ERC-6909 standard) to support custom allocators and arbiters, allowing teams to plug Tribunal or other interop protocols into the same execution flow.

What is the Open Intents Framework, and how is LI.FI Intents related?

The Open Intents Framework (OIF) is a public-good initiative led by the Ethereum Foundation, with 30-plus contributing organizations producing shared smart contracts, an open-source Rust solver, and standard interfaces for expressing and settling intents. LI.FI describes LI.FI Intents as "the OIF, in production, at scale," meaning the product is a direct application of OIF reference contracts rather than a parallel implementation.

The thesis behind the OIF, quoted from LI.FI's brief: "if every team has to make their own choice on how an intent is expressed, settled, and verified, the ecosystem fragments." OIF aims to be the common substrate for intent-based systems, similar to how ERC-20 is the common substrate for fungible tokens. The framework references ERC-7683 (the cross-chain intent standard co-authored by Uniswap Labs and Across Labs, per EIP-7683) as shared tooling for solver coordination.

How is LI.FI Intents different from a traditional bridge aggregator?

A traditional bridge aggregator routes users to a chosen bridge or DEX and lets that protocol's mechanics determine speed, slippage, and finality. LI.FI Intents instead has solvers commit to an exact-output amount upfront and execute the fill themselves. The user does not pick a bridge. The solver does the routing internally and is on the hook for the difference between the quote and the actual execution.

The table below summarizes how LI.FI's intent product compares to LI.FI's earlier aggregator API and to a standalone solver network like Across or CoW Protocol.

Property

LI.FI Intents

Traditional bridge aggregator (LI.FI's pre-intents API)

Standalone solver network (Across, CoW)

User signs

An intent (destination, amount, minimum output)

A pre-quoted route through a specific bridge

An intent (varies by protocol)

Fulfillment

Solver fronts destination liquidity, competes on price

Bridge contract locks source, mints destination

Relayer fronts destination liquidity

Output guarantee

Exact-output amount enforced in the intent

Slippage-bound; output varies with route conditions

Exact-output (Across); price-improved (CoW)

Settlement model

Source funds released to solver after finality

Per-bridge mechanism (canonical, lock-and-mint, etc.)

Source funds released after solver fills destination

Standards used

Open Intents Framework + ERC-7683 patterns

Bridge-specific; no common intent standard

ERC-7683 (Across); CoW protocol settlement

Integrator surface

Hosted intent API + SDK

Route-quote API + executor SDK

Native protocol SDK

LI.FI's positioning is that the intent surface and the aggregator surface are complementary. The aggregator API still routes through bridges and DEXs where direct bridge execution is cheaper or where solver liquidity is thin. The intent engine takes over for stablecoin transfers and asset categories where solver-fronted liquidity gives a better outcome.

What chains and assets does LI.FI Intents support?

LI.FI's announcements name USDC and USDT stablecoin swaps and tokenized real-world assets (U.S. Treasuries, equities, commodities) as the launch focus for LI.FI Intents. The May 26, 2026 announcement does not enumerate a specific chain count for the intent product. LI.FI's broader aggregator API supports the major Ethereum L2s, BNB Chain, Solana, Polygon, and Arbitrum, per LI.FI's developer docs, and the intent product is rolling out on the same chain set as solver coverage expands.

Launch integrators named in LI.FI's announcement are Jumper (LI.FI's first-party swap UI) and Rabby (a wallet from DeBank). LI.FI separately reports 1,000-plus partner integrations across its aggregator product as of late 2025, per coverage of the December 2025 Series A extension, though that figure spans the full LI.FI surface, not the intent product specifically.

Where do solvers, allocators, and arbiters fit in?

Solvers, allocators, and arbiters are the three role-bearing actors in an intent-based execution. Solvers compete to fulfill the intent. Allocators validate the user's resource lock (the time-bound commitment of source funds). Arbiters verify that the executed action matches the intent before releasing the locked funds. These roles are formalized in the Open Intents Framework and surfaced as configurable layers in LI.FI Intents.

The role separation matters because it lets different teams plug in their own components. A regulated payment integrator could pair LI.FI's solver network with a custom arbiter that enforces compliance rules. A DAO treasury could use a custom allocator that gates which solvers are allowed to fill its orders. LI.FI's resource locks brief calls out Tribunal as one example of a pluggable arbiter framework. The Compact (ERC-6909) is the underlying allocation primitive.

How does LI.FI Intents fit into the broader intent landscape?

LI.FI Intents sits in a maturing intent landscape that includes Across, CoW Protocol, UniswapX, Anoma, deBridge DLN, Squid Router, 1inch Fusion+, and Eco Routes. Each takes a different position on what an intent expresses, who fills it, and how settlement is verified. LI.FI's position is hosted-execution with an OIF-aligned solver marketplace and an integrator-controlled routing surface.

The shared substrate across these systems is the intent pattern itself: a user signs an outcome, a competing party fills it, and a settlement contract verifies the result. ERC-7683 standardizes the cross-chain intent message format so that solvers can serve orders from multiple intent sources without rebuilding per-protocol plumbing. Eco Routes is one of the intent routers in the same neighborhood, aggregating execution rails (Hyperlane for cross-chain transport, CCTP for USDC) under a similar intent API for production stablecoin teams. Per Eco's developer docs, the focus is stablecoin orchestration across 15 chains. LI.FI's surface emphasizes a broader aggregator-plus-intent split.

Related reading

Sources and methodology. Product descriptions, solver mechanics, and launch integrator details pulled from LI.FI's "A More Intentional Ethereum" brief and the May 26, 2026 PR Newswire announcement. ERC-7683 details verified against EIP-7683. Series A funding details per CoinDesk coverage of the December 2025 round. Architecture interpretation reflects LI.FI documentation available as of June 2026.

Related reading

Did this answer your question?