GHO is Aave's native stablecoin, issued through a borrow-mint mechanism rather than minted against fiat reserves or a centralized vault. Users post collateral inside Aave V3 or V4 markets, then mint GHO directly against that collateral at a governance-set borrow rate. The protocol burns GHO on repayment. As of Q2 2026 GHO supply sits in the mid hundreds of millions per DeFiLlama, making it one of the largest CDP-style stablecoins after Sky's USDS.
​

Aave V4 changed how GHO works in two ways. First, V4 introduces a unified liquidity layer that lets multiple markets share collateral and liquidity through hub-and-spoke routing rather than running as isolated V3 pools. Second, V4 promotes GHO from a single-issuer stablecoin into a multi-facilitator system with an Anchor module that defends the peg through controlled mint/redeem against USDC. Both shifts are documented across docs.aave.com and the relevant Aave Improvement Proposals on governance.aave.com.
​

This article covers the V4 unified liquidity layer, the GHO facilitator model and current facilitator roster, the Anchor module's role in peg defense, stkGHO staking yield mechanics, and a side-by-side comparison of GHO, USDC, and USDT yield sources. The aim is enough mechanism to evaluate the position yourself, not a recommendation. For broader lending-protocol context see our Aave vs Morpho vs Spark vs Fluid comparison.
​

Aave V4 replaces the isolated-pool design of V3 with a unified liquidity layer. In V3, each market (Ethereum core, Arbitrum, Polygon, Base, and so on) was its own self-contained pool with its own utilization, rates, and risk parameters. Cross-chain or cross-market exposure required separate deposits in each pool. V4 routes liquidity through a shared layer so different spokes can draw from the same depositor base while keeping their own risk configuration.
​

The shift is documented in the V4 design papers and AIPs published on governance.aave.com. The practical effect for stablecoin users is that GHO borrow capacity, supply utilization, and rate-setting now operate against a larger consolidated liquidity surface rather than against a single market's idle balance. Aave also introduced premium and core spokes with different risk tiers, so conservative users can sit in core spokes while higher-yield positions route through premium spokes.
​

V4 also formalizes the facilitator model for GHO. Facilitators are whitelisted entities that can mint and burn GHO up to a per-facilitator cap, with rates and parameters set by Aave governance. The original V3 facilitator was the Aave protocol itself (the borrow-mint flow). V4 expanded the roster to include the GHO Stability Module, the FlashMinter facilitator, and the Anchor module described below. The full list of active facilitators and their caps is published in the GHO section of docs.aave.com.
​

The GHO borrow-mint mechanism issues GHO directly from Aave V3 and V4 markets against deposited collateral. A user supplies ETH, wstETH, WBTC, USDC, or another whitelisted asset, then borrows GHO at the governance-set rate. The protocol mints fresh GHO to the borrower's address. On repayment Aave burns the returned GHO. Interest paid by borrowers does not go to depositors (GHO has no depositor side); it accrues to the Aave DAO treasury.
​

This is the defining mechanical difference from how Aave's USDC, USDT, and DAI markets work. In a normal Aave market, depositors supply tokens and borrowers borrow against collateral; the spread between supply and borrow APY pays the depositors. With GHO, there are no depositors. The protocol creates GHO out of thin air against collateral, and destroys it on repayment. All borrower interest is protocol revenue rather than supplier yield.
​

The GHO borrow rate is governance-set rather than utilization-set. Aave governance adjusts the rate periodically based on peg conditions and competitive positioning against USDC, USDT, and Sky's USDS lending markets. Recent rate history is visible in the governance forum and in the Aave dApp. Borrowers can also pay a reduced rate by staking AAVE in the Safety Module and holding stkAAVE, which entitles them to a discount on the GHO borrow rate set by governance.
​

The facilitator model lets multiple whitelisted issuers mint and burn GHO up to per-facilitator caps. Each facilitator has its own minting logic, its own cap (called a bucket), and its own risk parameters. The Aave V3/V4 borrow-mint flow is one facilitator. The GHO Stability Module (GSM) is another. The FlashMinter facilitator enables flash mints for atomic arbitrage. The Anchor module described below is the most recent addition.
​

Each facilitator's bucket has a maximum capacity and a current utilization. When a facilitator mints GHO, its bucket utilization rises. When it burns GHO, utilization falls. The sum of all facilitator buckets is the maximum possible GHO supply. Aave governance sets caps based on each facilitator's risk profile, and can raise or lower them through standard AIP votes.
​

This design lets GHO expand its issuance channels without coupling all of them to the Aave borrow market. The GSM, for example, lets users swap USDC for GHO at a small fee, creating a stability buffer that helps defend the upside peg. The FlashMinter enables atomic mint-and-burn within a single transaction for arbitrage and liquidation flows. The facilitator model is closer in spirit to Sky's allocator design than to a single-issuer model like USDC.
​

The Anchor module is a facilitator that lets users swap USDC for GHO at a fixed exchange rate, subject to a small fee and a per-facilitator cap. When GHO trades above peg, arbitrageurs deposit USDC into the Anchor, receive freshly minted GHO at 1:1 (less fee), then sell GHO on the open market and capture the spread. The new GHO supply pushes the market price back toward $1. When GHO trades below peg, the flow reverses: users buy GHO cheap on the market, redeem against USDC at the Anchor (less fee), and capture the discount until the price closes.
​

The Anchor's role is structural. Without a redemption layer, a CDP stablecoin can drift from peg if borrowers do not have an incentive to close positions when the market price falls. Sky uses the Peg Stability Module (PSM) for the same purpose with USDC. The Anchor is Aave's version of that mechanism, sized and parameterized for GHO. Current Anchor capacity and fee parameters are published in the GHO docs on docs.aave.com.
​

The trade-off is that the Anchor backs a slice of GHO supply with USDC reserves rather than with overcollateralized crypto positions. That changes the risk profile of the marginal GHO unit. Holders who care about pure CDP backing should track the share of GHO sourced through the Anchor versus through the standard borrow-mint flow. The split is visible in the GHO supply breakdown maintained by the Aave DAO and by third-party trackers including DeFiLlama.
​

stkGHO is GHO staked in the Aave Safety Module, the protocol's backstop reserve. Stakers receive a yield denominated in GHO (and sometimes in AAVE) for taking on the role of last-resort liquidity in the event of a shortfall event in the Aave protocol. The Safety Module exists across both V3 and V4 and accepts AAVE, ABPT (Aave Balancer Pool Tokens), and stkGHO as stakeable assets.
​

Staking GHO mints stkGHO at the current exchange rate. The contract pays an emissions-based yield from the Aave DAO's ecosystem reserve. As of Q2 2026 the published stkGHO yield sits in a competitive band against USDC and USDT supply rates on the same chains; the exact number is set by governance and changes periodically. Current rates are visible in the Safety Module section of the Aave dApp and in docs.aave.com.
​

The catch is the slashing condition. If Aave suffers a shortfall event (bad debt that exceeds the protocol's reserves), governance can vote to slash up to a defined percentage of staked assets in the Safety Module to make depositors whole. stkGHO sits on the line. Stakers earn yield in calm conditions and bear tail risk in stress conditions. There is also a cooldown period from initiating unstake to receiving GHO, designed to prevent stakers from exiting ahead of a slashing event.
​

GHO, USDC, and USDT are the three most-borrowed stablecoins in Aave V3 and V4, but the yield mechanics differ substantially. The table below summarizes the key differences across issuer model, yield source, and where the rate is set.
​

For USDC and USDT on Aave, supplier APY tracks utilization. When borrow demand is high, supplier APY rises; when utilization drops, so does APY. The borrow rate floats on a kinked curve set per market. Current rates by chain are visible in the Aave dApp and in third-party feeds including DeFiLlama Yields.
​

For GHO, there is no supplier side at all. Holders earn yield only by staking into stkGHO and accepting slashing risk, or by deploying GHO into secondary venues (Balancer pools, Curve pools, Pendle PTs). The implicit yield to a passive GHO holder is zero; the explicit yield to a stkGHO holder is set by governance plus emissions. For a fuller view of USDC yield options across protocols, see our best USDC yield platforms 2026.
​

GHO and stkGHO carry a distinct risk surface from fiat-backed stablecoins. The main risks are peg risk (CDP stablecoins can drift below peg when collateral conditions deteriorate), Safety Module slashing (stkGHO holders can lose principal in a protocol shortfall), facilitator risk (a misconfigured facilitator could mint beyond intended bounds), and smart contract risk in the V4 unified liquidity layer.
​

Peg risk is partially mitigated by the Anchor module's USDC backing. The trade-off is that the Anchor changes the marginal backing of GHO from pure crypto collateral to a mix of crypto collateral and USDC reserves. Slashing risk applies only to stkGHO; passive GHO holders are not exposed to Safety Module slashing. Facilitator risk is governed through caps and AIP review; the GHO docs publish the current roster of approved facilitators and their bucket sizes.
​

Smart contract risk increased modestly in the V4 transition because the unified liquidity layer is newer code than the V3 isolated-pool design. Aave V4 has undergone audit cycles documented on governance.aave.com and in the protocol's audit page. The Aave Safety Module also serves as a backstop for shortfall events, though the published size of the module should not be assumed without checking current on-chain data; the exact backstop capacity depends on staked AAVE, ABPT, and stkGHO at any given time.
​

GHO sits in the CDP-backed stablecoin category alongside Sky's USDS and DAI. The category is distinct from fiat-backed stablecoins (USDC, USDT) and from synthetic-dollar designs (Ethena's USDe). CDP stablecoins are minted against onchain collateral that the issuer does not custody directly; the issuer owns the protocol logic, not the reserves. Sky and Aave both run multi-facilitator versions of this design.
​

Within the CDP category, USDS dominates by supply (multi-billion) while GHO sits in the mid hundreds of millions. The growth path for GHO depends on V4 adoption, facilitator expansion, and Anchor capacity scaling. For yield-seeking holders, stkGHO competes with sUSDS, sDAI, and Aave's USDC supply rate on a per-chain basis. The rate that wins on any given week depends on Aave governance for stkGHO, Sky governance for sUSDS, and utilization for USDC.
​

For cross-chain stablecoin routing, Eco's stablecoin orchestration platform moves USDC, USDT, and USDS across supported chains via canonical bridges and CCTP. GHO has begun expanding beyond Ethereum mainnet to additional chains including Arbitrum and Base via Aave's cross-chain liquidity infrastructure, but the multi-chain footprint is still maturing relative to the fiat-backed dollars.
​

No. GHO is a CDP stablecoin minted by users against crypto collateral inside Aave V3 and V4 markets, plus a USDC-backed slice issued through the Anchor module. There is no fiat reserve account behind GHO. The closest comparison is Sky's USDS, which uses a similar overcollateralized CDP design with a peg stability module.
​

The main onchain yield route is staking into stkGHO via the Aave Safety Module, which pays governance-set emissions in exchange for accepting slashing risk in a protocol shortfall event. Other routes include providing liquidity in GHO-USDC or GHO-USDT pools on Balancer or Curve, and selling GHO yield tokens (YT) on Pendle. There is no native supplier-side yield because GHO is mint-burn rather than borrow-against-supply.
​

Aave governance can vote to slash up to a defined percentage of stkGHO if the protocol experiences a shortfall event (bad debt exceeding reserves). The slashing condition has not been triggered to date, but it is a real tail risk. Stakers accept this risk in exchange for the emissions yield. The cooldown period also prevents quick exits ahead of a vote.
​

The GHO borrow rate is set by Aave governance and tends to sit in a competitive band against USDC's utilization-driven borrow rate on the same chain. stkAAVE holders receive a discount on the GHO borrow rate that USDC borrowers do not. Recent rate decisions are tracked in the Aave governance forum on governance.aave.com.
​

The Anchor module charges a fee on USDC-to-GHO and GHO-to-USDC swaps. The fee is set by Aave governance and is intended to be small enough to allow arbitrage flow but large enough to disincentivize using the Anchor as a primary liquidity source. Current parameters are published in the GHO section of docs.aave.com.
​

Mechanism descriptions reference the Aave V4 design papers and the GHO documentation at docs.aave.com and the relevant Aave Improvement Proposals on governance.aave.com. Supply and TVL figures cross-reference DeFiLlama. Rate comparisons in the table are mechanism-level (how the rate is set) rather than point-in-time numbers, because per-chain rates change continuously and any quoted figure ages within days. For current rates check the Aave dApp directly or DeFiLlama Yields filtered to Aave markets.
​

Aave vs Morpho vs Spark vs Fluid 2026 comparison
​

Best USDC yield platforms 2026
​

USDS Sky stablecoin overview
​

Aave V3 vs V4 changes
​

Safest stablecoin yield options
​