Skip to main content

Stellar's tokenized RWA ecosystem: WisdomTree, Ondo, Franklin

Written by Eco
Stellar's tokenized RWA ecosystem: WisdomTree, Ondo, Franklin

Stellar's tokenized real-world asset footprint sits between roughly $1.2 billion (per the Messari State of Stellar Q1 2026 report) and $2 billion or more (per the Stellar Development Foundation press release dated May 2026), depending on whether the tally counts only registered fund and certificate products or includes broader stablecoin TVL. Either way, the network is one of the most active venues for regulated onchain treasuries and yield-bearing instruments outside Ethereum. Figure Technology Solutions just added YLDS to that mix as the first SEC-registered yield-bearing dollar product on Stellar. This article walks through who issues what on Stellar, why issuers keep choosing the network for regulated products, and how Stellar's protocol-level asset primitives shape RWA design.

Who issues tokenized RWAs on Stellar

Four issuers anchor the Stellar RWA stack: WisdomTree, Ondo Finance, Franklin Templeton, and Figure. Each targets a different regulatory wrapper and investor base. WisdomTree runs a registered money market fund. Ondo runs a Reg S note backed by Treasuries and bank deposits. Franklin Templeton tokenizes its FOBXX share class. Figure issues a face-amount certificate. All four route settlement through Stellar's native asset primitives.

Comparison: the four anchor issuers

Product

Issuer

Wrapper type

Stellar launch

Accessibility

Stated supply / AUM

WTGXX Treasury Money Market Digital Fund

WisdomTree Digital Funds

'40 Act money market fund

2024

US retail and institutional via WisdomTree Prime app

See WisdomTree disclosures

USDY

Ondo Finance

Note backed by short-term US Treasuries and bank deposits

Multi-chain (see Ondo's published TVL)

Reg S, non-US retail and institutional

See Ondo's published TVL

BENJI (FOBXX)

Franklin Templeton

'40 Act money market fund

2021 (Stellar was BENJI's first chain)

US retail via Benji app, plus institutional

See Franklin Templeton disclosures

YLDS

Figure Certificate Company (Figure Technology Solutions, Nasdaq: FIGR)

SEC-registered face-amount certificate (Section 28 of the Investment Company Act of 1940)

May 5, 2026 (existing on Provenance since Feb 2025, Solana since Nov 2025)

Targeting fintechs, neobanks, LATAM users

SOFR minus 0.50% pass-through yield

Specific share-class tickers, AUM figures, and minimum investment sizes vary by distribution platform and should be verified against each issuer's most recent prospectus or product page before quoting in commercial contexts.

Why are tokenized funds choosing Stellar over Ethereum?

Stellar's appeal for regulated RWA issuers comes down to four properties: deterministic three-to-five-second finality, transaction fees measured in fractions of a cent, native asset issuance primitives that don't require a token contract, and a regulated bridge ecosystem (Anchorage Digital, Bitstamp) issuers already use for fiat onramps. For products that credit yield daily or move balances between custodians intraday, those properties remove friction Ethereum issuers solve with L2s.

The protocol design difference

Ethereum tokenization runs through ERC-20 contracts that issuers extend with allowlists, blocklists, and pause functions. Each issuer ships its own implementation, audits it, and inherits whatever bugs the contract carries. Stellar takes a different approach: the network protocol itself defines what an asset is, who can hold it, and how transfers are authorized. Issuers configure flags rather than write code.

What that means for compliance teams

A '40 Act money market fund administrator who needs to enforce KYC at the share level, freeze a balance under a court order, or claw back tokens sent to a sanctioned address can do so through Stellar's built-in authorization flags instead of custom Solidity. The compliance surface area is smaller. That matters when the legal opinion supporting the product has to cover every state of the chain.

How Stellar's design serves RWAs differently than Ethereum

Three Stellar primitives show up repeatedly in regulated RWA designs: trust lines, asset issuer authorization flags, and claimable balances. Each one solves a problem Ethereum issuers handle in contract code, which means Stellar issuers get the same control surface without the audit burden. Issuers like Franklin Templeton, which has been on Stellar since 2021, have spent years building operational pipelines around these primitives.

Trust lines

Before a Stellar account can hold a non-native asset, it must explicitly establish a trust line to the issuer. The issuer can require authorization before the trust line activates, which lets a tokenized money market fund verify KYC status before any transfer is possible. There is no equivalent at the protocol level on Ethereum; ERC-20 contracts implement this manually.

Authorization flags

Issuers set authorization required, authorization revocable, and authorization clawback enabled flags at the asset level. A revocable authorization lets the issuer freeze a holder's balance for compliance. Clawback lets the issuer reclaim tokens, which several US-regulated wrappers require for adverse claim resolution. Setting these flags is a configuration change, not a contract deployment.

Claimable balances

Claimable balances let an issuer create a payment that a recipient must claim before it lands in their account. For yield distributions, that lets an issuer post the daily accrual atomically and have each holder pull it on their own schedule, without trusting a third-party distribution contract. Franklin Templeton has used this primitive for daily dividend posting on BENJI.

What's driving Stellar RWA growth

Three trends explain the climb from a handful of pilot products to the current $1.2B-$2B+ range: a US Treasury yield environment that made onchain dollar yield commercially interesting, a wave of '40 Act and SEC-registered wrappers that made products distributable to US retail, and a Stellar-native distribution channel through fintech apps targeting LATAM, where users want USD exposure plus yield without a US bank account.

The yield environment

With short-term US Treasury yields elevated through 2024 and into 2026, tokenized money market funds and Treasury-backed notes started looking competitive against zero-yield stablecoins. BENJI and USDY both pass yield through to holders, and the spread between holding USDC (no issuer-distributed yield) and holding USDY or BENJI became too large to ignore for treasury teams.

The regulatory wave

Through 2024 and 2025, the SEC granted no-action relief and registration approvals for several tokenized fund structures. Franklin Templeton's BENJI was an early example. WisdomTree extended its registered fund family onchain with WTGXX and adjacent share classes. Figure's YLDS adds the first face-amount certificate to the Stellar list. Each new wrapper expanded the addressable market for Stellar-native products.

The LATAM channel

Stellar's fintech and neobank partners in Argentina and Brazil already move USD-denominated stablecoins to retail users hedging against local currency volatility. Adding a yield-bearing product to that distribution channel is a small UX change with a large yield delta. Figure's YLDS launch announcement names LATAM users as a target market for exactly this reason.

What's coming next on Stellar

Issuers and the Stellar Development Foundation have signaled more tokenized treasuries and yield products through 2026 and 2027, alongside Soroban-based programmability that opens DeFi composability for regulated assets. The pattern of '40 Act fund tokenization should continue as more managers follow Franklin and WisdomTree onchain. Tokenized credit and structured notes are likely to follow once the templates stabilize.

Soroban changes the composability story

Stellar's Soroban smart contract environment landed on mainnet in 2024 and is maturing through 2025 and 2026. For RWA issuers, Soroban opens a path to programmable yield distribution, automated compliance checks, and DeFi integrations without giving up the protocol-level asset controls authorization flags provide. A money market fund token can sit in a Soroban lending market while the issuer retains clawback authority. That combination is harder to replicate cleanly on a pure-EVM chain.

The institutional pipeline

Anchorage Digital, Bitstamp, and other regulated custodians have built Stellar support into their institutional stacks. New issuers entering the market in 2026 inherit that custody surface area on day one, which lowers the operational lift compared to bootstrapping a new chain. Asset managers evaluating tokenization programs cite this as a recurring reason Stellar shows up on their shortlist alongside Ethereum and Avalanche.

What to watch

Three signals matter: how quickly new SEC-registered wrappers stack onto Stellar after YLDS, whether Soroban-based DeFi protocols develop the volume to make tokenized yield products composable beyond simple holding, and whether the LATAM distribution channel produces visible retail uptake numbers other issuers can underwrite against. Watch issuer disclosures and Stellar Development Foundation quarterly reports for the AUM and holder-count data that will tell that story over the next four quarters.

How this connects to Eco's onchain dollar work

Eco research focuses on stablecoin payments, cross-chain routing, and the rails moving regulated dollar products between networks. Stellar's RWA build-out is one of the clearest demonstrations that issuers don't need a single chain to win. They need protocol primitives matching their compliance posture. The network's authorization flags and trust lines do for regulated assets what Eco's intent-based routing does for stablecoin payments: remove friction at the layer where products actually live.

Methodology and sources

Stellar RWA total stated as a range: ~$1.2B per Messari's State of Stellar Q1 2026 report, $2B+ per the Stellar Development Foundation's May 2026 YLDS press release. The two figures use different scopes (registered fund and certificate products vs broader RWA inclusive of stablecoin TVL). Figure YLDS facts cited from the Stellar Development Foundation launch press release and Figure Markets' original Feb 2025 disclosure (SOFR minus 0.50% rate). WisdomTree, Ondo, and Franklin Templeton product details should be verified against issuer disclosures before commercial use.

Related reading

Did this answer your question?