Skip to main content

BTCfi 2026: Bitcoin Yield, Lending, and Wrapped BTC Growth

Map of the BTCfi category in 2026: wrapped BTC variants (cirBTC, WBTC, cbBTC, tBTC, FBTC), Bitcoin L2s (Babylon, Stacks, BoB, Bitlayer, Merlin), and native BTC DeFi by TVL.

Written by Eco


BTCfi, short for Bitcoin finance, is the catch-all label for protocols that put BTC to work earning yield, backing loans, or settling trades onchain. For most of crypto's history, Bitcoin sat idle. By 2026, that changed. Wrapped BTC variants on Ethereum and L2s, native Bitcoin L2s like Babylon and Stacks, restaking primitives, and (as of 2026) self-custodial Bitcoin Staking on Stacks have pulled a meaningful slice of BTC into DeFi. This article maps the category: how the money is split between wrapped and native BTCfi, which protocols hold the most TVL, and where Circle's newly announced cirBTC fits into the picture.
​

What is BTCfi?

BTCfi covers any onchain financial activity where Bitcoin is the underlying asset. That includes wrapped BTC used as collateral on Ethereum lending markets, native Bitcoin DeFi on L2s like Stacks, restaking BTC to secure other chains via Babylon, and yield strategies that route BTC across multiple chains. DeFiLlama tracks the category separately from general DeFi TVL.
​

Why did BTCfi take off in 2025 and 2026?

Three forces converged. First, institutional spot BTC ETFs normalized Bitcoin as a treasury asset, and treasuries wanted yield on their holdings. Second, Babylon shipped Bitcoin-native restaking in 2024 and crossed meaningful TVL by mid-2025, giving holders a way to earn yield without bridging. Third, a wave of credible Bitcoin L2s, including BoB, Bitlayer, and Merlin, launched with EVM compatibility, making it easier for existing DeFi protocols to deploy.
​

Layered on top, new wrapped BTC issuers entered the market. Coinbase launched cbBTC in September 2024. Antalpha Prime and Mantle shipped FBTC. Circle announced cirBTC in 2026, targeting institutional flow. Wrapped BTC stopped being a single-issuer category and became competitive, which compressed risk premiums and pulled more BTC onchain.
​

How big is BTCfi in 2026?

By DeFiLlama's BTCfi category, total value secured sits in the tens of billions of USD as of May 2026, depending on how restaking is counted. The split is roughly: wrapped BTC on Ethereum and L2s holds the largest share, followed by Babylon restaking, with native Bitcoin DeFi on Stacks, BoB, and Bitlayer making up the rest. Exact figures shift daily. Pull current numbers from DeFiLlama before quoting.
​

Wrapped BTC: the dominant BTCfi rail

Wrapped BTC variants are the single largest BTCfi bucket. They take native BTC into custody and mint a 1:1 ERC-20 representation on Ethereum or another EVM chain. That token can then be lent, borrowed, used as collateral, or LP'd. The major variants in 2026:

  • WBTC. BitGo's original wrapped BTC, launched 2019. BiT Global added as a co-custodian in 2024. Still the largest wrapped BTC by supply.

  • cbBTC. Coinbase-issued, launched September 2024. Custody held by Coinbase Custody. Grew rapidly on Base and Ethereum.

  • tBTC. Threshold Network's threshold ECDSA-cryptography-secured wrapped BTC. Non-custodial relative to BitGo/Coinbase models. Supply around $500M+.

  • FBTC. Antalpha Prime custody with Mantle distribution. Supply around $1.5B+.

  • cirBTC. Circle's institutional wrapped BTC, announced 2026. 1:1 backed by native BTC with onchain verifiable reserves. Launching on Ethereum and Arc, Circle's L1. Coming soon, subject to regulatory approvals.

Bitcoin L2s and native BTCfi

Native BTCfi means protocols where BTC stays closer to the Bitcoin base layer. Babylon pioneered Bitcoin-native staking by letting holders lock BTC to secure proof-of-stake chains and earn yield without wrapping. Stacks is the longest-running Bitcoin L2 and hosts Alex (Sovryn runs on RSK, a separate Bitcoin sidechain). Since self-custodial Bitcoin Staking went live on Stacks in 2026, the ecosystem has grown a dedicated liquid-staking stack: Stacking DAO issues stBTC (a liquid, yield-bearing Bitcoin Staking token), and Zest Protocol layers a levered vault on top of it, see the dedicated section below. Newer EVM-compatible L2s anchored to Bitcoin, including BoB, Bitlayer, and Merlin, sit between native and wrapped: they use BTC as gas or collateral while running familiar Solidity contracts.
​

Top BTCfi protocols by TVL

The table below ranks the eight largest BTCfi protocols by reported TVL as of May 2026. Verify against DeFiLlama before citing.

Protocol
​

Category
​

Approx TVL
​

Mechanism
​

Native or Wrapped
​

Babylon
​

BTC restaking
​

$4B+
​

Native BTC staking via timelocks
​

Native
​

Aave (BTC markets)
​

Lending
​

$3B+
​

WBTC/cbBTC as collateral on Ethereum
​

Wrapped
​

Morpho (BTC vaults)
​

Lending
​

$1.5B+
​

Curated BTC lending markets
​

Wrapped
​

Lombard
​

Liquid restaking
​

$1.5B+
​

LBTC backed by Babylon-staked BTC
​

Hybrid
​

Bitlayer
​

Bitcoin L2
​

$500M+
​

EVM L2 anchored to BTC
​

Native
​

BoB (Build on Bitcoin)
​

Bitcoin L2
​

$300M+
​

Hybrid L2 with BTC and ETH security
​

Native
​

Sovryn
​

Native BTC DeFi
​

$60M+
​

Lending and DEX on Stacks/RSK
​

Native
​

Alex
​

Native BTC DeFi
​

$30M+
​

DEX and yield on Stacks
​

Native
​

Stacking DAO (stBTC)
​

BTC liquid staking
​

$54M+
​

Liquid staking token for Stacks' Bitcoin Staking yield (Stacking DAO)
​

Hybrid
​

Lending: where wrapped BTC earns the most

Aave and Morpho dominate wrapped BTC lending. Aave's BTC markets accept WBTC and cbBTC as collateral for borrowing USDC, USDT, and ETH. Morpho runs curated vaults that route BTC collateral through whitelisted lending markets with tighter risk parameters. Sky (formerly MakerDAO) accepts WBTC as collateral for minting USDS. When cirBTC ships, it will likely onboard to Aave, Morpho, and Sky given Circle's existing relationships with each.
​

Restaking: Babylon's wedge

Babylon's pitch is that BTC holders can earn yield without trusting a wrapped-token custodian. Holders lock BTC on Bitcoin via timelock scripts, and that locked BTC backs validators on proof-of-stake chains. Slashing is enforced cryptographically on Bitcoin. Liquid restaking protocols, including Lombard (LBTC), pxBTC, and uniBTC, then issue ERC-20 tokens representing staked BTC positions, which can be used in Ethereum DeFi. That stacks yield: base BTC plus restaking rewards plus DeFi yield.
​

Native Bitcoin DeFi on Stacks, Sovryn, Alex

Sovryn and Alex are the two longest-running native Bitcoin DeFi protocols. Sovryn operates on Rootstock and Stacks, offering BTC lending and a DEX. Alex runs on Stacks and focuses on a BTC-native DEX and yield products. Combined TVL is small relative to wrapped BTC on Ethereum, but the user profile differs: Bitcoin-maximalist holders who refuse to bridge to Ethereum.
​

Where does cirBTC fit?

cirBTC, announced by Circle in 2026, targets the institutional end of BTCfi. Circle's pitch is that OTC desks, market makers, lending protocols, and treasuries already trust Circle's USDC and EURC reserve model and want the same transparency for wrapped BTC. cirBTC will launch on Ethereum and Arc, Circle's L1, with 1:1 native BTC backing and onchain-verifiable reserves. Once live, it slots into the same lending and collateral surfaces as WBTC and cbBTC, with Circle's institutional distribution as the differentiator. Status as of May 2026: coming soon, subject to regulatory approvals, waitlist open at circle.com/cirbtc.
​

What are the main BTCfi risks in 2026?

Three risks dominate. Custody risk for wrapped BTC: WBTC, cbBTC, FBTC, and cirBTC all depend on a custodian holding the underlying. tBTC mitigates this with threshold cryptography. Bridge risk for cross-chain BTCfi: moving wrapped BTC between chains introduces bridge attack surface. Slashing and protocol risk for restaking: Babylon's slashing conditions are still being battle-tested at scale.
​

Stacks Bitcoin Staking, stBTC, and Zest's levered vault

Self-custodial Bitcoin Staking went live on Stacks in 2026, giving BTC holders a way to earn yield while keeping custody of their Bitcoin, with STX acting as the staking capacity behind it. Institutional participants followed quickly: 21shares and HashKey (Asia's largest staking provider) both joined Bitcoin Staking on Stacks in September 2026, and UTXO Management, a Nakamoto Inc. subsidiary, entered targeting roughly 3% BTC-denominated yield while keeping its Bitcoin under its own custody (Stacks' Q2 2026 ecosystem report).
​

Stacking DAO issues stBTC, the liquid staking token that makes Bitcoin Staking yield usable across Stacks DeFi: deposit BTC or sBTC and receive an auto-compounding, yield-bearing token that targets roughly 2.6% net APY, backed by sBTC with Bitcoin Staking rewards accruing into its value over time. Stacking DAO reports $53.6M in total value locked as of September 2026.
​

Zest Protocol's Levered Bitcoin Staking Vault (zvstBTC), live since mid-September 2026, builds on top of stBTC: it posts stBTC as collateral in Zest's lending market, borrows sBTC against it, and stakes that sBTC into more stBTC, looping to amplify the base yield toward a 6-8% target APY versus stBTC's unlevered ~2.6%. Initial capacity is capped at 10 BTC while the strategy is stress-tested. Zest's Stacks lending market has reported zero bad debt since launching in March 2024, per Crypto Briefing's coverage of the vault launch.
​

The practical read for BTC holders: Bitcoin Staking is the underlying yield source, stBTC is what makes that yield liquid and composable, and Zest's vault is an optional, higher-risk way to lever exposure to it. Each additional layer (staking, liquid wrapper, leverage loop) adds smart contract and peg risk on top of Stacks' base Bitcoin Staking assumptions.
​

How will BTCfi evolve through 2026?

Three trends to watch. First, more wrapped BTC issuers will enter, compressing fees and risk premiums. cirBTC is the most institutional entrant. Second, Babylon-style restaking will likely consolidate into a few liquid restaking tokens that dominate Ethereum integrations. Third, Bitcoin L2s will fight for the EVM-compatible BTCfi segment, with Bitlayer, BoB, and Merlin competing on bridge UX and DeFi depth.
​

Methodology and sources

TVL figures pulled from DeFiLlama's BTCfi category and per-protocol pages, May 2026. Protocol mechanics verified against each project's docs: Babylon, Stacks, BoB, Bitlayer, Merlin, Sovryn, Alex, Threshold Network, BitGo, Coinbase, Mantle, Circle. cirBTC details from circle.com/cirbtc and Circle's 2026 announcement. Numbers shift daily. Re-verify before citing in production contexts.
​

Sources: DeFiLlama BTCfi category, Babylon docs, Stacks docs, BoB docs, Bitlayer docs, Merlin docs, Sovryn docs, Alex docs, Threshold Network docs, BitGo WBTC site, Coinbase cbBTC announcement, Mantle FBTC docs, circle.com/cirbtc.
​

Related reading

Did this answer your question?